CZ5229 China Southern Airlines - Flight Status

Which is the frequency of flight CZ5229?
The flight CZ5229 is currently not scheduled at Shanghai Pudong Airport (PVG).

Which is the distance of flight CZ5229?
The distance between the two airports is 6921 kilometers.

Which is the flight time of flight CZ5229?
The scheduled flight time gate to gate is: 07:27 hours.
The real flight time gate to gate on average is: 16:00 hours.

Are the departure airport and arrival airport at the same Time Zone?
No, each airport is in a different timezone. The times shown above, are presented in the local time of each respective airport.
Current Time in Shanghai: 2026-08-08 15:08:39
Current Time in Anchorage: 2026-08-07 23:08:39

The following airlines serves the same route between Shanghai and Anchorage:

UPS
- Flight Number: 5X81. (On Time performance: 11 - Average Delay: 64 minutes)
- Flight Number: 5X83. (On Time performance: 23 - Average Delay: 45 minutes)

Atlas Air
- Flight Number: 5Y365.
- Flight Number: 5Y512. (On Time performance: 13 - Average Delay: 102 minutes)
- Flight Number: 5Y518. (On Time performance: 6 - Average Delay: 162 minutes)
- Flight Number: 5Y532. (On Time performance: 7 - Average Delay: 97 minutes)
- Flight Number: 5Y538. (On Time performance: 5 - Average Delay: 102 minutes)
- Flight Number: 5Y751. (On Time performance: 4 - Average Delay: 115 minutes)
- Flight Number: 5Y753. (On Time performance: 8 - Average Delay: 102 minutes)
- Flight Number: 5Y755. (On Time performance: 10 - Average Delay: 89 minutes)
- Flight Number: 5Y792. (On Time performance: 15 - Average Delay: 81 minutes)
- Flight Number: 5Y804. (On Time performance: 18 - Average Delay: 116 minutes)
- Flight Number: 5Y8102. (On Time performance: 8 - Average Delay: 109 minutes)
- Flight Number: 5Y812. (On Time performance: 12 - Average Delay: 83 minutes)
- Flight Number: 5Y8174. (On Time performance: 5 - Average Delay: 110 minutes)
- Flight Number: 5Y8275.
- Flight Number: 5Y8422. (On Time performance: 25 - Average Delay: 141 minutes)
- Flight Number: 5Y8676. (On Time performance: 7 - Average Delay: 75 minutes)
- Flight Number: 5Y8904.
- Flight Number: 5Y8915. (On Time performance: 15 - Average Delay: 37 minutes)

Air China
- Flight Number: CA1009. (On Time performance: 5 - Average Delay: 58 minutes)
- Flight Number: CA1187. (On Time performance: 6 - Average Delay: 50 minutes)
- Flight Number: CA1189. (On Time performance: 14 - Average Delay: 50 minutes)

China Southern Cargo
- Flight Number: CSG2501. (On Time performance: 12 - Average Delay: 45 minutes)
- Flight Number: CSG2503. (On Time performance: 36 - Average Delay: 39 minutes)
- Flight Number: CSG2521. (On Time performance: 20 - Average Delay: 34 minutes)
- Flight Number: CSG2523. (On Time performance: 31 - Average Delay: 27 minutes)
- Flight Number: CSG2525. (On Time performance: 20 - Average Delay: 72 minutes)

China Southern Airlines
- Flight Number: CZ5227.

Kalitta Air
- Flight Number: K4915.
- Flight Number: K4917. (On Time performance: 6 - Average Delay: 135 minutes)
- Flight Number: K4919. (On Time performance: 15 - Average Delay: 99 minutes)
- Flight Number: K4979.

Korean Air
- Flight Number: KE249. (On Time performance: 30 - Average Delay: 50 minutes)
- Flight Number: KE259. (On Time performance: 8 - Average Delay: 90 minutes)

National Airlines
- Flight Number: N8652. (On Time performance: 10 - Average Delay: 139 minutes)

Polar Air Cargo
- Flight Number: PO998. (On Time performance: 22 - Average Delay: 77 minutes)

We have gathered data from recent months and present below an analysis of how timely the flights have been.

Delays analyzed by Weekday: We have gathered available data from last six months, spanning from May 23, 2026 to July 25, 2026. Next, you can observe the results broken down by day of the week: number of flights analyzed, on-time performance per day, and average delay per day.

Delays analyzed by Month: It is not possible to calculate the On-Time Performance for this flight accurately by month due to insufficient or non-representative data, as doing so could lead to misleading conclusions